2019 Awards nominations have closed
2019 Awards nomination webinar
Nominators are strongly encouraged to attend an AES Zoom webinar on the Awards scheduled for Monday 29 April 2019, 40 minutes, commencing 12:00 AEST. The webinar will cover the steps involved in the nomination process, the different Awards categories, and how to ensure a complete nomination is submitted.
Date and time: 29 April 12:00 midday AEST
A nominee must have been a member of the AES for a minimum period of 12 months prior to the nomination closing date:
- except that a nominee for the Emerging New Talent Award must have been a member at the time of nomination but is exempt from the 12-month minimum membership requirement.
- in the case of a group nomination, at least one nominee must meet the 12-month minimum membership requirement.
Monday 1 July 2019
All nominations and supporting documentation are treated as commercial-in-confidence and are confidentially handled and stored, and all copies appropriately destroyed at the conclusion of the awards process by the AES and the Awards Panel judges.
The awards are judged using three criteria. The first two criteria, professionalism and ethical conduct, must be clearly demonstrated, while the third will be assessed on a scale against the attributes relevant to the category:
- Ethical conduct
- Excellence of the evaluation work
The principles of professionalism and ethical conduct mainly apply to the role of the evaluator and/or the evaluation team. The principle of excellence is mainly concerned with evaluation practice and products.
The evaluation team/person demonstrates high professional standards especially in dealing with challenges presented in their work. Relevant professional bodies have statements of applicable professional standards.
The evaluation team/person demonstrates high standards high standards of ethical conduct, including adherence to the AES Code of Ethics and AES Guidelines for the Ethical Conduct of Evaluations. In particular, nominations will demonstrate, where appropriate, an understanding of the special ethical considerations involved in evaluation work with Indigenous people, and the vulnerability or disempowerment of people in dependent or unequal relationships
Excellence of the evaluation work
The evaluation work (or person) should demonstrate attributes of excellence in ways relevant to the award category:
3.1 Sound use of evaluation theory and approaches.
3.2 High quality and effective practice in consultation, design, planning, data collection, analysis and reporting.
3.3 Stakeholders highly satisfied with the evaluation work and its use or impact.
3.4 Significant contribution to utility and knowledge in the domain in which the evaluation is conducted.
3.5 Innovative approaches that contribute to, or that have the potential to contribute to evaluation knowledge and practice.
3.6 Outstanding contribution to the body of evaluation knowledge, for example through education, training, mentoring, writing, speaking on professional issues.
3.7 Outstanding contribution to attaining AES objects.
The attributes of excellence apply to the award categories as outlined in the list below:
- Evaluation Study or Project Award – Attributes 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5
- Evaluation Policy and Systems Award – Attributes 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5
- Community Development Evaluation Award – Attributes 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5
- Indigenous Evaluation Award – Attributes 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5
- Evaluation Publication (Caulley Tulloch) Award – Attributes 3.1, 3.4 and 3.6
- Public Sector Evaluation Award – Attributes 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5
- Emerging New Talent Award – Attributes 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4
- Outstanding Contribution to Evaluation Award – Attributes 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.6 and 3.7
Awards and Recognition Working Group 2019
- Dana Cross
- Richard Cummings
- Wei Leng Kwok (Co-chair)
- David McDonald
- Ian Patrick (Co-chair)
- Mathea Roorda
- Farida Fleming